@34859 @292 @255 @145 good thread 👀 https://twitter.com/…
@34859 @292 @255 @145
good thread 👀
https://twitter.com/Deadlochcom/status/1366506335173566468?s=20
Replies
So right yet so wrong.
🤔
95% right. BSV needs outsiders like this that have a clue more than outsiders need BSV people to repeat irrelevant craigisms to them
He’s 100% right about DeFi. That’s not where he’s wrong.
Yeah your wallet’s gonna be great, do you have a stateful overlay with proper composability yet?
@8202 <- only other person that seems to get it
Someone put a EVM into a bitbus channel ffs. “OP_RETURN” lmao
Run is what you looking for
Almost
What’s missing?
Global state
There is a global state there just not ergonomic way to read or write it, depending on use case
🤯
It’s actually global state that is atomically composable between apps and also globally addressable
No composition, no defi
No global addressing, no defi
And before you say anything UTXO points are specifically not the kind of addressable you need because it’s transient.
An no UTXO and key hashes aren’t an addressing scheme for purposes of composables. It’s a subtle issue...
https://github.com/mr-word/manadocs-public/blob/master/for-bsv-devs.md
How this has anything to do with l2 tokens unless you argue for l2 tokens with l1 defi?
It could all be L1, that’s the only valuable thing worth attempting here
We would gladly support l1. But fork would take a year(s) and indeed bch works on similar fork proposals since the split, then few more years to figure out defi primitives. Then there are new fuds and 4th gen chains 😂