@2956 @931 @255 not disappointed in the content but are pri…

You would think so. Ultimately @2956 will make a rational decision. If you look at the older videos, prices are already reduced to $1 instead of $2.

I have some thoughts on this and what will likely play out. Hope to share at a later date. .

I love the content the question was based simply on future adoption. Figure its about $200 for cable for 720hrs of content. Comes to $3.60 an hour but thats for 2 tv sets. So a family of 4 is roughly $0.90 per hour. 2nd guessing myself if this will work.

lets say you cut your cable and just have internet. Lets say $80 per month. Netflix $16. Thats $96 per month for 4 screens each being a family of 4 comes to about $0.12 cents per hour of content. Its going to be tough battle.

Also when will it be available on android/apple app store

Different markets. I suspect someone trying to build niche audience could charge significantly more than this. Some substack newsletters are $100/month.

But we're optimizing for fun! 50 paid viewers are more fun than 1,000 free.

What if you could subscribe to a channel? Pay a one time fee that's set by the content creator...then you dont have to worry about cost anymore.

That sounds good but i dont mind paying per video though. I just thought to myself binge watching someones channel it will add up and will steer me away from watching. Also thinking along the lines of selling the idea of paying for content to someone new.

Or a weekly/monthly/annual payment option.

how can i convince my friends and family that this is the wave of the future. Telling them that its cheaper then cable tv/netflix is a good selling point.

I dont know how much you make as a youtuber. But if its lets say $10,000 per 1 million views thats $0.01 per view. It has to be worth it for the content creator to come over. But cheap enough that a person can watch 100 videos without breaking the bank