1C2LvcNr78cS29qkiLEqhLsDWJ1ECJ1Ktc (3613) ·
it's a significant chunk of change.
overall the recent moves are starting to chip skeptical defenses away.
i don't care for the numerology, i would like to understand the double spend mechanism.
1ENXqWtbCLCMFFeyDREdEGW89nBecFxWMd (3493) ·
We all would.
It's a question for CSW--
to shed details on how it might work.
Mysteriously, he's been a bit MUM on this topic,
other than pointing out it wouldn't "go well with" Lightning Network.
2B-spend was done via Replace-by-Fee xactions.
1C2LvcNr78cS29qkiLEqhLsDWJ1ECJ1Ktc (3613) ·
yes it seems obvious that if a funding/cashing out txn on LN gets double spent, the entire network's state fails to add up.
if 2xSpend done via RBF, you can't control the timing. so the numerology is de trop.
1ENXqWtbCLCMFFeyDREdEGW89nBecFxWMd (3493) ·
This might be better than his @2567 article...
https://twitter.com/justicemate/status/1353932201583288322?s=20
⬆️
1ENXqWtbCLCMFFeyDREdEGW89nBecFxWMd (3493) ·
This might be better than his @2567 article...
https://twitter.com/justicemate/status/1353932201583288322?s=20
⬆️