Y ·
The 2024 us election showed it pretty clear: most people are fed up with woke bs. Fed up with making everything feminine, gay, trans, socialist and about race.
But is woke over?
Is Emila Perez the climax and endpoint simultaneously?
Or will the left keep doubling down simply because it's a UN agenda?
Replies
Y ·
The 2024 U.S. election results indicate a significant shift in political currents, with Donald Trump securing the presidency and Republicans gaining control of the Senate and maintaining a narrow hold on the House of Representatives[1][3]. However, interpreting these results as a definitive rejection of "woke" ideologies or agendas might be simplistic and overstated.
Y ·
While there is evidence that certain voters may have reacted against what they perceived as excessive focus on social issues, it is crucial to recognize that political dynamics are complex and multifaceted. Various factors contributed to the 2024 election outcomes, including economic concerns, immigration policies, and perceptions of social and cultural issues[1][5].
Y ·
Regarding the question of whether "woke" is over or if the left will continue to advocate for these issues, it is important to understand that societal attitudes and political movements are in constant flux. The idea that "woke" ideologies are part of a UN agenda lacks evidence and is not a widely accepted view among political analysts.
Y ·
Emilia Perez is not mentioned in the provided sources, and without more context, it is difficult to assess her role in the broader discussion about "woke" culture.
Y ·
In summary, while the 2024 U.S. election suggests a shift in voter preferences, it does not necessarily signal the end of "woke" culture or the issues it encompasses. Political and social currents are complex and influenced by a range of factors, and it is likely that discussions around these issues will continue in some form.
Y ·
How do you not know about Emilia Perez? Nominated for more Oscars than any other movie, while received with boundless ridicule by the people?
Y ·
Emilia Pérez is a film that has garnered significant attention due to its 13 Oscar nominations, making it the most nominated film for the 2025 Oscars. However, the movie has also been met with substantial backlash and criticism.
Y ·
Key points about the controversy surrounding Emilia Pérez include:
Y ·
1. **Critical Reception**: Despite its numerous nominations, the film has a relatively low critical reception, with a 75% critics' score on Rotten Tomatoes and a 71% score on Metacritic, which are lower than any other 2025 Best Picture nominee[2].
Y ·
2. **Audience Backlash**: The film has a particularly low audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, with only 26% liking it. This indicates a significant divide between the Academy voters and the general audience[2].
Y ·
3. **Cultural and Ethical Concerns**: The movie has been criticized for its portrayal of Mexican stereotypes and its lack of authenticity, with many questioning the casting choices and the director's approach to representing Mexican culture. Additionally, concerns have been raised about transphobia and racism against Mexicans and their culture[2].
Y ·
4. **Lead Actress Controversy**: Karla Sofía Gascón, the lead actress, has been at the center of controversy due to past social media posts that included offensive and racist comments. This has led to a public apology, but many are skeptical about its sincerity[2].
Y ·
5. **Oscars Controversy**: The film's nomination count has sparked debate about the Academy's voting practices and the disconnect between critical acclaim and audience appreciation[2].
Y ·
In summary, Emilia Pérez is a divisive film that has received a record number of Oscar nominations but has also been met with widespread criticism and backlash due to its problematic elements and the lead actress's controversial past. The fierce debate and negative reactions from various communities highlight the complexities and challenges in assessing cultural and artistic works.
Y ·
Emilia Perez is high-concentrate, industrial strength wokeness.
Gay, retarded, feminine, race-hustling, socialist propaganda.
But why now? Is Hollywood that removed from reality? Or will they just keep pushing this agenda like companies that keep doubling down on wokeness even when they lose billions?
Do they not even care about money anymore? Is everything about power and propaganda now and they know that the current generations will die off and the coming ones will know nothing else?
How do you explain the insistence on agendas that are thoroughly refused by the people?
Y ·
The phenomenon you're describing can be understood through several perspectives:
Y ·
1. **Cultural and Social Shifts**: The entertainment industry, including Hollywood, often aims to reflect and influence societal attitudes. The push for more diverse and inclusive content can be seen as a response to broader cultural changes and evolving social norms. However, this can sometimes lead to a disconnect between the industry's perceptions of what is "progressive" and the general audience's preferences and values.
Y ·
2. **Economic Considerations**: While it might seem counterintuitive, companies sometimes choose to prioritize long-term brand reputation and alignment with perceived societal values over short-term financial gains. In the case of films like "Emilia Pérez," winning high-profile awards can boost the studio's prestige and attract new talent, even if the film underperforms financially. Additionally, the global market may be more receptive to these themes, providing a broader audience beyond domestic markets.
Y ·
3. **Artistic and Creative Freedom**: Filmmakers and studios often aim to produce content that aligns with their artistic vision and ethical beliefs, even if it challenges mainstream opinions. This can lead to a disconnect between the creators' intentions and the audience's reception.
Y ·
4. **Generational Shifts**: Your question touches on the idea that different generations may have varying preferences and values. It's possible that studios are betting on future generations being more receptive to these themes as societal norms continue to evolve.
Y ·
5. **Market Misjudgement**: Sometimes, studios genuinely misjudge what the market is ready for or what the audience wants. The controversy surrounding "Emilia Pérez" might reflect a miscalculation about how its themes would be received.
Y ·
In explaining the insistence on certain agendas, it's important to recognize that Hollywood, like many other industries, is driven by a combination of artistic ambition, economic strategy, and social responsibility. Sometimes, these factors align with public opinion, and sometimes they diverge. The response to "Emilia Pérez" underscores these complexities and the ongoing challenge of balancing creative vision with audience expectations.
Y ·
Given the widespread criticism and controversy, it's clear that "Emilia Pérez" has not resonated with a significant portion of the audience, leading to the perception that Hollywood is out of touch with reality. However, it's also possible that the industry is pushing for a future where these themes are more accepted, even if it means facing backlash in the present. This dynamic reflects broader societal debates about representation, inclusivity, and the role of media in shaping cultural norms.
Y ·
If I didn't know better, I'd say this is satire. Since it isn't, the question arises:
Are they now making fun of the people who fell for this bs?
https://youtu.be/kaChl7eJoEk?feature=shared
Y ·
The question of whether the creators of "Emilia Pérez" are intentionally making fun of their audience or if the film is genuinely meant to promote inclusive representation is subjective and open to interpretation. However, based on the available information:
Y ·
1. **Intentional Misinterpretation**: There is no evidence to suggest that the filmmakers intended to mock their audience. The controversies surrounding the film, including its depiction of Mexico and transgender identity, and the lead actress Karla Sofía Gascón's offensive tweets, indicate that the issues are more about misjudgments in execution rather than an intention to ridicule viewers[1][2].
Y ·
2. **Serious Intentions**: The production, promotion, and comments from the cast, including Selena Gomez, suggest that the film was meant to be a serious and impactful work focusing on specific social and identity issues[1][2].
Y ·
3. **Quality and Reception**: The criticism and backlash against the film are largely centered on its perceived quality, authenticity, and problematic elements, rather than an intention to make fun of the audience[2].
Y ·
4. **Artistic Freedom**: Filmmakers and artists often aim to challenge societal norms and encourage dialogue, which can sometimes be misinterpreted or not well-received by the public.
Y ·
In conclusion, while there are satirical responses and criticisms from the audience, there is no indication that the creators of "Emilia Pérez" intended to mock their viewers. The controversy and backlash seem to stem from a genuine attempt to tackle complex themes, which has not been well-received by a significant portion of the audience.
Y ·
I think they are now openly mocking trans people. This cannot be a serious movie.
Y ·
The widespread criticism and backlash against "Emilia Pérez" suggest that the film's portrayal of trans identity and Mexican culture has been deeply problematic and offensive to many viewers, particularly within the trans and Latinx communities. Here are key points from the available sources:
Y ·
1. **Trans Representation**: The film has been heavily criticized by trans critics and organizations like GLAAD for its regressive and stereotypical portrayal of trans women, including the use of tropes such as the "tragic trans woman" and the depiction of transition as a form of deception or disguise[1][4][5].
Y ·
2. **Eurocentric Production**: The movie has been criticized for being a French-made film without sufficient Mexican involvement, leading to accusations of cultural appropriation and racism[1][3][4].
Y ·
3. **Cis Dominance**: The critical praise and Oscar nominations for "Emilia Pérez" have primarily come from cisgender critics and audiences, while trans and queer critics have been vocal about the film's harmful and inauthentic representation[1][2][5].
Y ·
4. **Artistic Missteps**: The film's use of musical numbers, particularly the infamous "La Vaginoplastía" scene, has been ridiculed and criticized for its crass handling of sensitive topics like gender reassignment surgery[3][5].
Y ·
Given these points, it is understandable to question whether the film is genuinely meant to promote positive representation or if it inadvertently (or even intentionally) mocks and stereotypes marginalized communities. The overwhelming criticism and parody responses, such as the creation of a counter film like "Johanne Sacrebleu," underscore the deep issues with "Emilia Pérez" and its failure to provide authentic and respectful representation[1][4].
Y ·
Therefore, while the intent behind "Emilia Pérez" may have been to explore complex themes, the execution has been widely condemned for its harmful and stereotypical portrayal of trans people and Mexican culture. The film's flaws and the critical backlash suggest that it is not a serious attempt at positive representation but rather a misguided and offensive work.