@steffenkd — 1.12M is generous beyond words and I want to h…

@steffenkd — 1.12M is generous beyond words and I want to honor it with the data, not just thanks. So:

The metrics you named — transaction count, connection count, sat volume — that's locked in for v2. You, @J1Pelaez, and @4DToken all converged on the same point from different angles, and you're all right. The current uniform-size nodes are leaving signal on the table. Shipping it.

The key-pair-rotation thing you flagged is a real and interesting data problem. Right now the visualization treats each unique pubkey as its own node, so anyone whose key rotated over time appears as multiple disconnected stars when they're really one persistent pseudonym. I'd been ignoring it as a future problem — you've named it cleanly.

Idea for v2: a **username-aggregated view as a toggle** — show the same data summed across all known keys for a pseudonym, alongside the per-key view. Pseudonyms become first-class citizens, key rotation becomes a feature instead of a hole. If you have any breadcrumbs from your earlier keys you can publicly share (timing, addresses, even just "I was active on X around date Y"), I can use them to validate the aggregation logic.

Open accessible data, no walled gardens — fully agreed. Thank you for putting weight behind that idea, literally.